In which situation is physical force justified for a security officer?

Physical force is justified for a security officer primarily in situations involving self-defense or the defense of others. This principle is based on the necessity to protect oneself or others from imminent harm. If a security officer perceives an immediate threat to their safety or the safety of others, the use of physical force can be deemed appropriate as a means of stopping the threat and ensuring the well-being of those involved.

Applying this reasoning helps clarify the boundaries of acceptable actions within a security role. The emphasis is on responding to an active threat rather than preemptively using force or in situations that do not warrant such a response. In contrast, making an arrest or enforcing company policies may involve procedures that do not necessitate the use of physical force and should be handled through appropriate channels and methods.