In what situation is it appropriate for an armed security officer to use their firearm?

The appropriate situation for an armed security officer to use their firearm is defined by strictly adhering to the principle of using deadly force only in life-threatening situations. This means that a security officer must perceive an imminent threat to their life or the life of others that cannot be mitigated through other means. The law and training emphasize that firearms are a last resort; officers should first attempt to de-escalate situations, use non-lethal means, or retreat to safety if possible.

Using a firearm solely because one feels threatened or under any criminal activity would be inappropriate and could lead to tragic consequences, as the situation may not warrant lethal force. Similarly, while employer authorization is crucial for an officer's duties, it does not serve as a blanket justification for discharging a weapon unless a clear and immediate threat exists. Thus, the focus on life-threatening situations ensures that armed responses are responsible, legally justifiable, and aligned with the standards set for security personnel.